Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contact Report 424"
(Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by Thomas57 - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
--Hawaiian 00:46, 15 April 2010 (BST) | --Hawaiian 00:46, 15 April 2010 (BST) | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | == Thomas57 said ... == | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
+ | There are several inconsistencies in the Contact(37 & 424) reporting data - of which this is one. In 1975 Semyase says the Hill's WERE taken and experimented upon and 2006 Ptaah tells Billy that the 'electromagnetic earth energies are the causal agent of the Hills 'abduction. | ||
+ | |||
+ | While I am not 'muddying over Ptaah's comments, perhaps - it behooves ALL of us reading ANY material to cross reference it and to think about the consequences to exposing more than necessary to others. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Thomas57|Thomas Horner]] 00:17, 14 June 2010 (BST) | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 00:17, 14 June 2010
Comments on Contact Report 424 <comments />
interwake said ...
newinitiation said ...
Billy and the Plejarens talk about contacts outside of military and noncivilian kind. There exists many purported reports from Military sources alleging contacts with aliens (or is this the work of the shadowy group?). Because Billy and the plejarens cannot talk about contacts concerning the military sorts we can only assume that minute section of witness testimony from disclosure may just be true.
--newinitiation 11:54, 8 April 2010 (BST)
john said ...
This is very, VERY confusing. As why is Ptaah saying that what happened to the Hills was untrue and caused by delusions infered by the electromagnetic field of the Earth. Where as in Contact report 37, Semjase explains that they are beings from the Zeta Reticuli star system. ?????? This is the first real contradiction I've read in all these cantact reports. And furthermore, though not mentioned anywhere in the Contact reports, how could someone like Whitley Strieber not be considered to have a real experience very similar to the Hills as well as Travis Walton. I believe in all of this, but this puts a strain on my belief, only as it is such clear contridiction. Could someone please explain this glaring discrepancy!
--john 21:08, 12 April 2010 (BST)
john said ...
well???
--john 17:17, 14 April 2010 (BST)
Hawaiian said ...
John,
I would have to agree with you, Contact Note 37 regarding Semjase's comments contradicts Ptaah's more recent statements regarding the abduction of the Hills couple. The Plejarens are also human and prone to mistakes, why Ptaah chose to counter his daughter's remarks remains a mystery?
Maybe it's an attempt to stop other people's delusional aspiration in claiming the same type of abductions from the same or different ET...who knows..maybe you should ask Ptaah himself? There are just too many agendas, both Earthly and non-Earthly sources in this "equation"
--Hawaiian 00:46, 15 April 2010 (BST)
Thomas57 said ...
There are several inconsistencies in the Contact(37 & 424) reporting data - of which this is one. In 1975 Semyase says the Hill's WERE taken and experimented upon and 2006 Ptaah tells Billy that the 'electromagnetic earth energies are the causal agent of the Hills 'abduction.
While I am not 'muddying over Ptaah's comments, perhaps - it behooves ALL of us reading ANY material to cross reference it and to think about the consequences to exposing more than necessary to others.
--Thomas Horner 00:17, 14 June 2010 (BST)
The explanation given for electro magnetic delusion of abductions is beneath even the intelligence of the Giza penis heads. Sorry the truth penetrates even the sphinxcter of the bottomless pyramids. Shame on you dear Aqurius with Moon in Scorpio. One simply must update to better technology from NASA if they cant tell one alien lie from another.
--interwake 16:54, 29 March 2010 (BST)