Difference between revisions of "Talk:Polls"

From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by Jason Renteria - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Ted Denmark - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 137: Line 137:
  
 
--Jason Renteria 00:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 
--Jason Renteria 00:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
</div>
 +
== Ted Denmark said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
In question 3 the term "Creator God" is a bit unfortunate--though I can see why you might have chosen it to resolve a number of issues--but much of the Meier material is about the tension between the worlds of understanding  these two words (the unique Pleiadian "Creation" concept and the "Jshwsh God" historical re-interpretation), so that the meaning of the question is obfuscated and unanswerable in your multiple choices, except for "none of the above" (don't you just hate it when that happens?).  Similarly in question 1, the choice of words for "truth incarnate" makes it harder to give Billy the high rating he probably deserves over just "telling the truth," but these are subtle issues that you may look at for your next version of the poll.
 +
 +
--Ted Denmark 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 01:46, 10 March 2010

Comments on Polls <comments />


dave bax said ...

Spelling definitely

--dave bax 02:54, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

joseph catacutan said ...

thought i havent read nor explore all of billy's materials and information, i could conclude based on simple logic that billy is telling the truth. Who else in this earth could or would dare duplicate his work? It is not easy to assume the role of a prophet and to produce results. WHO WILL VOLUNTEER? I BET NOBODY! I fully support BILLY and his mission.


--joseph catacutan 03:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Jorge Diaz said ...

EXCELENT WORK,I wish I could help somehow and be a part of this effort. Much of the contents of this page have been very helpful for me and have helped me in changing my life for the better. I wish I could find a way to express my sincere gratitude for all the people involved in this project. THANK YOU

--Jorge Diaz 05:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Jamesm said ...

I stand corrected on the spelling of definitely. Interesting article here.

I better leave the current poll as is because I may corrupt it by changing the text.

Thanks

--Jamesm 11:56, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

wilrod82 said ...

1. Under Earth humans standards, the evidence is overwhelming, but circunstancial. A few apparent contradictions. Still it should be given a lot more attention by the media and the governments. 2. Even if the population numbers were acceptable, it stills need to be controled. There are too many children without proper parent supervision. Too many children out of wedlock.

--wilrod82 12:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Mark Deleon said ...

I have been reading up on Billy's adventurous stories and let me tell you that they should make a movie series. There is just too much excitement in all those contact reports. Peace to everyone and make sure to flip the sign around if you have any shirt or clothing bearing it or get laser blasted. :)

--Mark Deleon 13:07, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

shawn bayne said ...

Thank you Billy for your untiring dedication to the human race. I have found substantive value and the inspiration to change my life into a more positive, and constructive force for myself and my fellow human beings.I check every day for new information and news. Salome!


--shawn bayne 14:06, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

João Jorge o. carvalho said ...

Letś go...

--João Jorge o. carvalho 14:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Wasil said ...

This is a great way of viewing responses of the forum members.

--Wasil 15:36, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

victor catarisano said ...

anyone who still believes that earth is the only planet inhibited today has to be delusional

--victor catarisano 15:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Karrol Steeves said ...

Thanks for all the hard work!

--Karrol Steeves 18:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

George Champ said ...

I really appreciate this website, I check it daily for new things that I may have missed in regards to the Meier material. Great job, oh by the way I can't figure out how to log in that chat/discussion page.

--George Champ 18:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

cupnsaucer said ...

its interesting to see people coming to this site that dont seem sure of what it is there looking at.for some the truth is found and others are still finding or looking .use your logic and trust it.peace to all.

--cupnsaucer 19:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

12y1 said ...

I believe that Billy Meier is telling the truth and that opposing forces are very much trying to distract us from the light beings.

--12y1 20:54, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Forest said ...

Would like to see more polls on various subjects

related to the Billy Meier experience.

--Forest 23:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Jason Renteria said ...

Billy dice la verdad

--Jason Renteria 00:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Jason Renteria said ...

Billy dice la verdad

--Jason Renteria 00:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Jason Renteria said ...

Billy dice la verdad

--Jason Renteria 00:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Ted Denmark said ...

In question 3 the term "Creator God" is a bit unfortunate--though I can see why you might have chosen it to resolve a number of issues--but much of the Meier material is about the tension between the worlds of understanding these two words (the unique Pleiadian "Creation" concept and the "Jshwsh God" historical re-interpretation), so that the meaning of the question is obfuscated and unanswerable in your multiple choices, except for "none of the above" (don't you just hate it when that happens?). Similarly in question 1, the choice of words for "truth incarnate" makes it harder to give Billy the high rating he probably deserves over just "telling the truth," but these are subtle issues that you may look at for your next version of the poll.

--Ted Denmark 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)