Talk:Contact Report 424

Comments on Contact Report 424 <comments />

---

interwake said ...

The explanation given for electro magnetic delusion of abductions is beneath even the intelligence of the Giza penis heads. Sorry the truth penetrates even the sphinxcter of the bottomless pyramids. Shame on you dear Aqurius with Moon in Scorpio. One simply must update to better technology from NASA if they cant tell one alien lie from another.

--interwake 16:54, 29 March 2010 (BST)

newinitiation said ...

Billy and the Plejarens talk about contacts outside of military and noncivilian kind. There exists many purported reports from Military sources alleging contacts with aliens (or is this the work of the shadowy group?). Because Billy and the plejarens cannot talk about contacts concerning the military sorts we can only assume that minute section of witness testimony from disclosure may just be true.

--newinitiation 11:54, 8 April 2010 (BST)

john said ...

This is very, VERY confusing. As why is Ptaah saying that what happened to the Hills was untrue and caused by delusions infered by the electromagnetic field of the Earth. Where as in Contact report 37, Semjase explains that they are beings from the Zeta Reticuli star system. ?????? This is the first real contradiction I've read in all these cantact reports. And furthermore, though not mentioned anywhere in the Contact reports, how could someone like Whitley Strieber not be considered to have a real experience very similar to the Hills as well as Travis Walton. I believe in all of this, but this puts a strain on my belief, only as it is such clear contridiction. Could someone please explain this glaring discrepancy!

--john 21:08, 12 April 2010 (BST)

john said ...

well???

--john 17:17, 14 April 2010 (BST)

Hawaiian said ...

John,

I would have to agree with you, Contact Note 37 regarding Semjase's comments contradicts Ptaah's more recent statements regarding the abduction of the Hills couple. The Plejarens are also human and prone to mistakes, why Ptaah chose to counter his daughter's remarks remains a mystery?

Maybe it's an attempt to stop other people's delusional aspiration in claiming the same type of abductions from the same or different ET...who knows..maybe you should ask Ptaah himself? There are just too many agendas, both Earthly and non-Earthly sources in this "equation"

--Hawaiian 00:46, 15 April 2010 (BST)

Thomas57 said ...

There are several inconsistencies in the Contact(37 & 424) reporting data - of which this is one. In 1975 Semyase says the Hill's WERE taken and experimented upon and 2006 Ptaah tells Billy that the 'electromagnetic earth energies are the causal agent of the Hills 'abduction.

While I am not 'muddying over Ptaah's comments, perhaps - it behooves ALL of us reading ANY material to cross reference it and to think about the consequences to exposing more than necessary to others.

--Thomas Horner 00:17, 14 June 2010 (BST)

Mark said ...

Thomas57 that was a good find.:) I think someone told a little too much info than was suppose to be known at the time "Semjase" and maybe my guess is the High Council instructed Ptaah to reject all claims to ease fears in man of Earth. At a later date all may be revealed. There are some truths that must be revealed at the right time. I'm sure Semjase was grounded for at least 100 years of year 1,000 year life cycle. :) j/k

--Mark 07:58, 14 June 2010 (BST)

Newinitiation said ...

The Plejarens had acknowledged that they were too trusting of earth human beings and that they had taken our words at face value until the truth got the better of them. Also they didn't have the sonean technology at that time to make things unequivocally clear. As they said they aren't perfect nor are they superhuman beings capable of everything. As for the electromagnetic disturbances of the earth which influenced the hills, I think they were referring to the Giza intelligence's telenotic electromagnetic mind control devices used on them to bring about a false memory just as they had influenced several other human beings in the past.

--Newinitiation 04:36, 3 October 2010 (BST)

Sanjin said ...

I think that Newinitiation is right. Basically they initially jumped to a conclusion based on false evidence (witness testimonials and similar things), which they also do explain in CR424.

--Sanjin 20:34, 3 October 2010 (BST)